Simon's posts

Author Archive

July 27, 2009 at 4:17 pm

Is fundraising becoming a dirty word?

So here I am, sitting down to a meeting with another potential beautiful client and we’re doing the introductions.

The guy to my left is in charge of ‘Supporter Retention’ (not development, just retention?). The lady to my right looks after ‘Supporter Acquisition’.  Chairing the meeting is the Head of Supporter Relationship Marketing.

A couple of days before that, I was in a meeting with someone whose job title was ‘Individual Giving Officer – Acquisition’ and, recently, with someone else in charge of ‘Supporter Marketing’. A week or two ago I met a Head of Supporter Services, who was actually the head of the Individual Giving function at that particular charity.

In fact, all of these good people are fundraisers.

Back at the beautiful office, we began to wonder, is this a little like bin men becoming waste removal engineers?  Or how about the window cleaner who is now a vision clearance executive? And the coffee guy who has become a barista?

Perhaps this rash of obscure job titles is symptomatic of a deeper issue? Are charities (at least some of them) becoming embarrassed at the idea of asking for money?

Could part of the reason be the proliferation of ‘social media experts’ flooding into the sector offering charities advice? These self-proclaimed gurus, many of whom have little or no fundraising experience, sell a beguiling dream of online social communities coalescing around charities and good causes in a beatific haze of generosity. Nothing as crude as asking for money need ever happen, if you engage in a dialogue with them, people will just give…

The hell they will.

You won’t find corporate fundraisers pussy-footing around the idea of asking for money. They’d be out of a job. The same applies to Major Donor Fundraisers. (Note the word fundraisers in the job title.) You know exactly what they want when you’ve had a conversation with one of these people, and so does your bank manager.

A creative director who once made my life a misery hammered home a very good piece of advice when it comes to charities and donors: tell people what the problem is, and tell them what you want them to do about it. You want money? Just ask.
picture-2
Very few people put their hands in their pockets on the basis of a hint. Time after time, one of the top reasons donors cite for giving is, simply: ‘I was asked’.

Let’s not be embarrassed to be fundraisers. It’s a noble profession.

Permalink
Filed under: by Simon

@ 4:17 pm

 
July 24, 2009 at 4:35 pm

Beautiful internship

We have this wonderful intern.  She’s bright, ruthlessly efficient, a real pleasure to have around.

She’s learned about fundraising and marketing, and loads about data analysis, since she’s been with us.

There’s only one problem: she’s leaving to do an MA.

Know anyone who could replace her?

Email: rachel@hellobeautifulworld.com

Permalink
Filed under: by Simon

@ 4:35 pm

 
July 6, 2009 at 2:16 pm

Our first million pound banjo.

As things tend to in this office, it all began with a discussion about music. Both Adam and I play guitar. Him brilliantly. Me, less brilliantly (a lot less).  But it’s a passion, which means Rachel often has to endure one of us twanging away in the background, while she tries to get on with something more grown up.

“I’ve always wanted a banjo,” one of us said. Conversation ensued about the generally unsung nature of the banjo in these modern times. If you want to hear some real nice plucking and some damn fine country singing, let me recommend Ralph Stanley and the Clinch Mountain Boys’ album: Man of Constant Sorrow.  Guaranteed to put the “yeeha!” back into your day.

“We should buy a beautiful world banjo.” The other one of us said.

In the thoughtful silence that followed a rather nice idea was born.

“Let’s buy one as soon as we raise a million pounds for one of our clients.”

“The million pound banjo!”

Million Pound Banjo

Now, that was a thought worth holding onto. And we did. I’m not saying that the incentive of a banjo was the only thing that spurred Adam on to work his recent data analysis magic, but, gosh-darn-it, it must’ve helped. The appeal in question turned out to be a record breaker for our client, and a banjo earner for us. We’ve called our new instrument “Lucky”, though Adam insists there was no luck involved.

Now, it turns out that a banjo tunes differently from a guitar (tricky).  And plays quite differently (even trickier).  So there’s a lot of practice needed (poor Rachel!). The other problem is, we only have one banjo between two of us.

Guess we’ll just have to earn another million for another client. Any takers?

Permalink
Filed under: by Simon

@ 2:16 pm

 
July 1, 2009 at 3:23 pm

Charity begins online

The centre spread in the Independent today is an article entitled: Charity begins online. It recognises that in these recessionary times, it is becoming harder and harder for charities to get their messages across, which is inevitably leading to them to re-evaluate their approach as to how to connect with people.  Basically any charity that knows its onions is now developing an online strategy, but how well are they doing it?

Expert opinions are provided by John Carnell, Steve Bridger, and our own Rachel Beer.  In Rachel’s opinion: “There are already huge numbers of charities on Twitter, but there’s a lot of uncertainty, and most of them are just trying it out – there might be one person in their office who’s set it up – and it’s certainly not integrated into their overall strategy.”

Steve Bridger can see charities tentatively waiting for the “gloriously disruptive” world of digital media to settle down. “But they should stop waiting for things to be perfect, and just embrace the messiness of the web,” he says. “They have no choice but to change their mind-set.”

John Carnell, founder and chief executive of Bullying UK, points out that “This approach has been at the heart of our work since the beginning, so it’s interesting to watch it become the next big thing. The public appreciate honest dialogue, and that’s one of the reasons our Twitter feed is often ranked in the top 1,000 worldwide.”

Rachel is quoted as saying:  “Charities are much more sensitive than brands.”  The point she wanted to make is that they know their supporters individually, by name, in a way most commercial brands never will, and those supporters are emotionally involved.

These are carefully nurtured relationships.   Charities are in it for the long term and they need their donors to be as well.   It’s not about volume.  As Rachel said: “A community of 15,000 people who are genuinely interested in a cause is worth a lot more than 100,000 people who are only mildly so.”  In other words, quality always wins out over quantity.

Permalink
Filed under: by Simon

@ 3:23 pm

 
June 26, 2009 at 5:06 pm

Marketing on Twitter: how to lose friends and alienate people

Twitter has become omni-present.  A lifeline for Iranian protesters; kept open at the request of the Whitehouse.  Quoted on the Today programme.  Dropped into sitcoms to make them feel up to the minute.  Even my, 80-year-old, mum wants to know what it’s all about.

These days we’re constantly meeting bewildered people who feel under pressure to enter what, to them, looks like a geeky world of impenetrable #tags, re-tweets, and tiny urls.  They know that if they don’t join in, they’ll get left behind.

One recent tweet summed it all up: “Saying you don’t use Twitter is like saying you don’t use email.”

Inevitably as more people are tweeting, other people, with dollar signs in their eyes, are trying to harness Twitter for commercial (or charitable) gain.  Yet, despite the attentions of growing numbers of experts, it’s hard to isolate techniques that will guarantee success.

Twitter is frustratingly resistant to marketing.  And that’s part of the appeal to most of its users.  Even with it’s huge popularity, Twitter still feels guerrilla-like.  A bit underground.  I love the fact that it’s got so many marketeers stumped.

Of course, that doesn’t stop them trying.  Companies are springing up all over offering to tweet on behalf of their “too busy” clients.  Personally, I think that money spent in this way is wasted.  No-one is fooled by these corporate tweeters pushing a party line.  It’s a bit like charging into the middle of a private party and yelling: “BUY BUDGENS BISCUITS!!!”  You may interrupt the conversation for a moment but you’ll be ignored for the idiot that you are.

Sometimes, the consequences of this kind of disconnected tweeting are downright disastrous.  Habitat’s ‘social media agency’, noticing the trending discussion on Iran was attracting huge numbers, added keywords (with hashtags), like  ‘#Iran‘ and ‘#Mousavi‘ to its tweets, so people watching the twitterstream and discussing those subjects would see the firm’s marketing messages.  Result: mass offence was taken at such crassness.

Far from selling products, Habitat found itself at the receiving end of a consumer backlash.

picture-113

Personality, emotion, authenticity – the sense that a real person is talking – these are the drivers at work on Twitter.  The paradox of Twitter is that it is a massive collection of private conversations being held in public (like a great big party). Be sensitive about how you join them.

Remember, it’s a social medium.  It offers the possibility for social alchemy – the right statement at the right moment, to the right group of people, with the right emotional ring to it can result in actions that become social gold.

If you want people to be interested in you, you need to give them a reason.  You need them to like you.  Marketing rules don’t apply here, more the rules of the schoolyard.

Permalink
Filed under: by Simon

@ 5:06 pm

 
home
clients
work
what we do
people
events
blog
press
jobs
contact

RSS Feed

connect with us:

beautiful world on Twitter
beautiful world on Facebook
beautiful world on Flickr
beautiful world on Posterous