Archive for the ‘blog’ Category

NFPtweetup seven session preview: Highlights from past tweetups

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

For our final blog post, we hear from Jonathan Waddingham with highlights from past NFPtweetup events.

With the seventh NFPtweetup upon us, you should be well on your way to knowing what to expect. But how did it come about, and what are the highlights you may have missed?

At the risk of navel-gazing, we’ve already done a “story so far” presentation (from November 2009) so you can see that to find out how it all started back in November 2008. But if you look at the first ever collaborative slideshow (we used to get everyone coming to send in a slide on a certain topic) it’s funny how some of the themes are still relevant today:

But that’s no surprise really – if you’re on Twitter then you’re communicating with people and are this involved in communications (to a greater or lesser degree). So you need to know who’s in control, what your message is, and what the goal is. The only thing that’s changed over the last couple of years is that there are more examples of charities doing these things well on Twitter (and other platforms).

This is what I find really interesting about the tweetups – hearing stories from the people who are actually making things happen, and them sharing their advice. There’s no self-promotion or agenda, no question is too simple or stupid, everyone’s very open and honest about their success and failures. And as much as we all like to communicate online, there’s no substitute for meeting people in real life (or IRL if you like) and putting a face to the avatar.

We’re proud at JustGiving to have supported the tweetup for the last two years, as I think so many people have taken away so much from all of the events. And they don’t happen by accident – it takes a lot of time and effort to organise the venue, speakers and agenda. So this time we’re even more excited than normal to support the event at our new office. I only hope it’s big enough for all you NFPtweeters!

But I’ll leave you with probably my favourite collaborative slideshow so far, on “finding your Twitter voice”. I think it’s the hardest thing to crack when you first join Twitter, and in these 18 slides, there are some fantastic examples of people, organisations and charities who manage to communicate their mission, calls to action and their personality in just 140 characters.

NFPtweetup Collaborative Slideshow – 27 May 09

View more presentations from Rachel Beer.
Looking forward to seeing everyone later today!

Jonathan Waddingham

@JustGiving

NFPtweetup seven session preview: LifeSupport: Change through art competition

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

For our sixth guest blog post, we hear from Ollie Drackford at YouthNet with a preview of what he’ll be sharing at the NFPtweetup this Thursday:

YouthNet’s online guide to life, TheSite.org, is a trusted source of information, advice and guidance on whole plethora of issues, ranging from relationships and sex, to the law and health.  It also holds a wealth of impartial articles, videos and podcasts about finance, supporting thousands of young people a month through problems around budgeting, bankruptcy and debt.

The recent economic crisis has heightened these problems for young people: with financial issues also impacting their job prospects, their study choices, relationships and mental health.  With this in mind, we set out to develop a campaign that would generate greater awareness of the related content, services and support available on TheSite.org.  Finance, however, doesn’t have quite the same ‘sex appeal’ as some of TheSite.org’s other website content – so how could we encourage young people to express their opinions on this topic?

The idea: a creative competition, ‘LifeSupport: Change through art’, asking 16 to 25-year-olds to submit artwork based on their experiences of the recession.  A competition that would engage and encourage them to share their thoughts and experiences on these troubling times, offering them a place for their voices to be heard on the issues, whilst at the same time signposting them to the support and advice on offer from TheSite.org.

With funding from the Citi Foundation, support from our agencies, beautiful world and Theobald Fox, and the involvement of our entire Communications and Marketing team, what started as a relatively small idea grew to a major integrated marketing and PR campaign.

Through a mixture of offline and online activities (with a particular focus on social media work), we were able to create a unique and pretty exciting campaign. You need only look at the awards exhibition, or the shortlisted entries and jaw-dropping winning video to see how successful and unique it was.

Join us on Thursday to find out more.

Ollie Drackford

@YouthNetUK

@OllieFD

NFPtweetup seven preview: What should you expect from NFPtweetup events?

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

For our fifth guest blog post, we hear from Howard Lake with his take on NFPtweetup events, what to expect and what you might get out of coming along or taking part:

Who do you go to when your PC or printer stops working? If you’re lucky, it’s the tech person in your office, whether that’s their job title or they just seem to know lots more about tech than you do. If not, it’s your tech friend or neighbour. We all have useful contacts whom we turn to when our computers and related kit stop working.

But it’s always a person. Of course we can search online for advice, but nothing is more reassuring as you stare at an alarmingly blank screen or search for that document that was in that folder than a calm, friendly tech person who has sorted out this kind of problem many times before.

The same is true of the headlong rush that is social media and all that it seems to offer to charities and voluntary organisations.

Which is why I’ve attended almost all the NFPtweetups that have taken place, and will be at the seventh one this week.

Don’t be put off by the jargon: NFP = not for profit, and tweetup = a meeting of people arranged via Twitter. Once you are through the doors of these increasingly popular (and free) events, you’ll find a room full of people from all kinds of charities who are keen to learn from each other. And, given the frenzy of activity around social media, there is always something to learn.

NFPtweetup events are always slightly different, which keeps them engaging.

Previous events have included collaborative slideshows of ideas, thoughts and lessons learned (where each slide is sent in by a different contributor), breakout groups and workshops to discuss specific areas of work, objectives or challenges many charities share, and there are always a selection of short presentations – usually case studies – from charities about their use of social media, sharing what has, and hasn’t worked for them.

But, above all, it is an opportunity to chat with people facing the same issues as you, and a chance to ask the ’silly’ questions‚ that you think would mark you out as far too behind the times with social media.

It’s a genuinely supportive event, and I leave every one with a list of new ideas and solutions to try out. I also always meet interesting people, some old friends and some new contacts. Even better, we stay in touch after the event via Twitter. So, I end up boosting my list of helpful people whom I can ask next time I get stuck.

Howard Lake
UK Fundraising
@howardlake

NFPtweetup seven session preview: Whizz-Kidz social media overview and update

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Those who came to the last NFPtweetup on 4 March are sure to remember Rob Dyson’s presentation on the first steps he had taken to monitor and measure the impact of Whizz-Kidz social media engagement. If you missed it, you missed out on Rob’s uniquely engaging and humourous delivery, but you can still see his slides on slideshare:

In our fifth blog post in the run up to NFPtweetup on Thursday, we hear from Rob, Pam and Jess from Whizz-Kidz with a preview of the update they will be giving us on Whizz-Kidz social media journey, including some of the tactics they use to engage with events fundraisers:

At youth mobility charity Whizz-Kidz we’ve been steadily increasing our social media and real-time web use over the last 18 months; trying and testing different platforms for different communications with our supporters and users.

However it’s only recently that we’ve really begun to evaluate and measure the reach of this experimentation. Pleasingly, the feedback and engagement levels kind of shows that, erm, we’re not experimenting anymore; we’re actually getting rather good at it.

There’s no room for complacency though, and there is constant demand for innovation in terms of how we harness our supporters, and importantly, how we subscribe more people to our bottom line: donating or fundraising so we can support more young disabled people year on year.

At the NFPtweetup on 10 June, we’ll be giving a brief overview of what works for us (it may not work for you).

Specifically:

Having a Facebook profile as a person – “Jess Whizz Kidz”, has proven an incredibly popular way to engage with our London Marathon runners. Participants may not always pick up the phone, but they do like using Facebook: you’re on their turf and building great relationships. Plus it’s on a Facebook wall (not stuck in an email) so can be shared, added to, and built upon by other runners.

Twitter is a fantastic viral tool, so we use it when we want to get messages out quickly and to a wide audience – we have loyal ambassadors who retweet us. We also talk a lot – chat, converse, ask questions and have discussions. We make friends.

YouTube (promoted via Facebook and Twitter) is the bees knees when wanting to paint a picture of the impact of our work. We have a growing portfolio of videos made by our young people telling their own stories, in their own words.

We hope you get some ideas from our short session, and we’re looking forward to hearing your successes to! We’re all learning.

Rob Dyson, PR & social media Manager – @robmdyson & @whizzkidz;
Pam O’Brien, Events Fundraising Manager;
Jess Leigh, London Marathon Project Manager and Events Fundraiser – @whizzkidzevents
Whizz-Kidz

NFPtweetup seven preview: Amy Sample Ward’s tips for tweetups

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

In our fourth blog post to warm up for NFPtweetup 7, it is over to Amy Sample Ward and her thoughts on how to make the most of tweetups:

This coming Thursday is the next NFPtweetup, taking place at JustGiving’s new offices. As part of a blog series leading up to the event, I was asked to share some thoughts on the event, especially for those coming along for the first time that may not know what to expect. As I started to collect my thoughts, though, I realized that my impressions and recommendations were really applicable to any tweetup or offline gathering of online networks.

I’m sure that you’ll have more to add—and I hope you will—but, here’s my list of key tips for making the most of tweetups!

Tip #1: Share Great Stories

You aren’t bound to 140 character updates any more, so let your storytelling flow! NFPtweetups and other events where online networks come together offline are unique opportunities and hear from practioners and colleagues and get the “real story.” There’s time and space to sit down and learn more about how others are doing what they do: the success stories and the not-so-successful stories. Lesson: Listen!

Tip #2: Ask Hard Questions

Whether it’s Twitter or email or a social network, people often find it difficult to ask hard questions online because it could be seen as overly negative or critical, maybe the shared glossary of terms don’t match up and the question is misunderstood, or there’s details that one side or the other don’t have access to. That’s not the case when you get to meet up face to face. This is a great chance to ask hard questions (when someone’s telling a success or not-so-successful story, ask for more details, ask why/how/what/when) and know that you will be able to be understood as will the answer. Especially with the NFPtweetup, these events are intended to be educational and valuable. Lesson: Ask!

Tip #3: Meet Real People

We all work hard to present ourselves online the way we want to be seen, either for our job/professional careers or to keep a line between personal life and work. Only knowing someone by their avatar or their username may make it difficult to share stories and ask hard questions, online. But, now you’re offline and can enjoy the presence of lots of other real people (note: we assume you’re a real person, too!). So, make friends! Find out what you have common (hobbies, music, travel) and what drives people to do the work they do (personal stories, passions, skills). It’s okay to be human, and it will actually strengthen the network when the offline event is over and people move back to the online connections. Lesson: Socialize!

Tip #4: Stay Present

I know it can be tempting to tweet, blog, and video every moment of the event. But, remember why you’ve come together. You are here to tell stories, ask questions and meet/make friends. Most events, like NFPtweetup, will have set up a live stream and nominated people to tweet and share in real time for those who couldn’t attend in person. The reason that those roles are selected and covered ahead of time is to free up all the other participants to stay present. Say thank you and enjoy the freedom! Lesson: Participate!

What are your tips for making the most of a tweetup? Have you attended the NFPtweetup before – will you be there this time? Look forward to connecting with you!

Amy

Global Community Builder
NetSquared
@amyrsward

NFPtweetup seven session preview: Dogs Trust and Twibbon fundraising

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

Many in the sector still seem to doubt that social media can be used for fundraising – in large part because there are so few examples of charities having tried – so we’re really lucky that Jacqui O’Beirne of Dogs Trust will be sharing the results of Dogs Trust’s Twibbon fundraising experiment at next week’s NFPtweetup. In our third blog post to warm up for the event, Jacqui gives us a sneak preview of what she’ll be sharing:

Dogs Trust, as most of you know, are sometimes heralded as the ‘best practice’ for NFP social media, and while we love that tag there was always a missing element for us that niggled – we never raised any money. We rehomed loads of dogs, which is our charity aim, but we never had a figure in our income column come month end.

We went into social media as a communications tool, not a fundraising one, but sitting in department of 30 others who are raising money made us feel a bit inferior.

So, never ones to pass up an opportunity, when JustGiving and Twibbon approached us about being their guinea pig for a product they were launching how could we say no?!

At next week’s NFPtweetup I’ll be sharing the results and learnings from our Valentines Day Twibbon Experiment, as well as answering any questions you may have about our work online.

See you all there!

Jacqui

Digital Marketing Manager
Dogs Trust
@jacquiobeirne @dogstrust

NFPtweetup seven session preview: Active Fat campaign show and tell

Friday, June 4th, 2010

In our second blog post to warm up for NFPtweetup next Thursday, 10 June, we get a little taster from Joe Freeman of Diabetes UK about what he, and colleagues from Cancer Research UK and British Heart Foundation, will be sharing at the event:

Diabetes UK, Cancer Research UK and the British Heart Foundation have been working together to raise awareness of the dangers of Active Fat. The fat that makes up your love handles – actually, I won’t assume that you have love handles, that would be rude… The fat that makes up my love handles doesn’t just sit there doing nothing. It’s active, and can cause cancer, Type 2 diabetes and heart disease – scary thought.

With this in mind, it was decided that we should raise awareness about it. Three charities, combining their powers to spread the message about the evilness of active fat. And Active Fat is evil, as I’m sure you’ve all seen in the wonderful animations that were created to spread the awareness message:

All three charities have a large online supporter base across a multitude of social networks and, by working together, we were able to share joint messages and spread the word much further than we would have been able to do on our own. We’ll be talking about how we did that and to what extent this was a success. Oh, and did we learn anything from it? We’ll share that too!

Joe

Digital Communities Manager
Diabetes UK
@JosephFreeman

NFPtweetup seven is just a week away!

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

We’re all getting very excited about the prospect of our seventh NFPtweetup event next Thursday, 10 June, and hoping it’s going to be the best yet.

We have some fab speakers coming along to share experiences and insights from their work with social media, from charities including British Heart Foundation, Diabetes UK, YouthNet and Whizz-Kidz, there are 94 people registered to attend the event from a range of charities large and small, and in between, representing a whole host of causes and a diverse range of specialisms, including (but not limited to!) marketing, fundraising, campaigining, volunteering, PR, digital and community management.

We decided we might have to channel some of this excitement into something constructive that people will find useful and that will set the scene for the event, so – starting today – we’re going to do a blog post per day until the day of the event. We hope it will help to get you warmed up for Thursday, and that it will be especially useful for people who haven’t been to an NFPtweetup before and aren’t sure what to expect.

We’re going to include some guest posts from speakers at the event, giving a preview of what they’ll be sharing on the night, and we’ll also have some other social media-related posts along the way, from some other people you might have heard of… (how mysterious).

So, look out for the next post in the series tomorrow, which will be a guest post from Joe Freeman from Diabetes UK, giving us a preview of what we can expect to hear from him at the event next week. I’m looking forward to it already!

Rachel

Fundraising work of unparalleled genius

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

The other day I got pleasant surprise in the form of an email from Sofii – a website set up by Ken Burnett as “The Showcase of Fundraising Innovation and Inspiration.”

The email features a best of the best list of work since Sofii was set up.  The item that brought a smile to my face was the RSPB brand stretch campaign I did when I was creative director of Cascaid (an agency now no longer with us).  I’d love to take all the credit, but I had help, notably from a very stylish art director (take a bow Angela Coster) and a clever writer (Selina Heathcote).

There is a great deal more to the RSPB than bird watching – it’s Europe’s biggest conservation society.  It protects huge swathes of British countryside, advises more than one government on matters such as climate change, fish stocks and coastal protection.  It is responsible for projects of breath-taking scale – it bought the logging rights to a rainforest in order not to log it, but to let it grow back to its former glory over the next hundred years or so.  How many charities could conceive a project that huge?

When we met, the RSPB had realised that, in order to grow its membership, it would have to grow public understanding of what it does.  In other words, how do you get normal people to join an organisation full of twitchers?

Our solution was a campaign that focused on those special times when nature unexpectedly intrudes on your life.  We called it an RSPB moment.  It could be an amazing sunset, the sighting of an urban fox, a special tree, a child’s fascination with an insect, or (of course) an encounter with a bird.  We made extensive use of the RSPB’s fabulous picture library – and the work that followed was simply breathtaking. Each ad, or mail-pack, was a moment in itself.

We took this thought into direct mail, press ads and online. People were invited to share their moments with each other on a microsite. The outpouring that followed was overwhelming. The moment’s campaign had touched a real nerve.

The stories that people gave us were funny, inspiring and at times very moving. For example, the woman who had gone profoundly deaf suddenly discovering that she could hear again from the cries of a kestrel hovering over her doorstep.

Sofii does what it says on the tin.  It showcases examples of great fundraising work, mostly from the present, but every so often it includes some real gems from the past where the thinking is still tellingly relevant.

IIf you’re wondering about the other featured work, have a look: WWF Canada, Amnesty, Dogs Trust, Oxfam, Breakthrough India, Agnes Holliday and Rebecca Brown, Station WNED, Muscular Dystrophy Group, and St Paul.

Anyone considering a career in fundraising would be instantly seduced by the work they saw on Sofii.  More importantly, so would (and were) donors.  The question is, why don’t we see work of this standard being produced more often by agencies and their clients?

Truth is we all try, but it’s harder than it looks.  The more people who get involved, the harder it becomes.  Every so often, all the right elements come together – right clients, right work, right time – and you end up with something exhilarating and wonderful. Sometimes I think we’re a little like surfers waiting for the perfect wave, enthused by the memory of the almost perfect one that came before.

The 6th #NFPtweetup round-up

Monday, March 8th, 2010

We had a fantastic 6th NFPtweetup at Breast Cancer Care last Thursday (check our posterous for the briefest summary).  So, before the night’s memories and #NFPtweetup mentions fade, I thought I’d try to capture the essence of it here:

The 6th event felt like it began long before it did, with an outpouring of excitement via Twitter as people made their way to the venue and those who could not attend in person expressing their disappointment in 140 characters.

After the t-shirt competition winners, @PontoonDock, @amyrsward, @HaveFunDoGood and special prize winner @RochelleDancel received their t-shirts, the event carried on with three great presentations:

UNICEF: Charlie Simpson – A media sensation

UNICEF were looking for a positive, UK based, Haiti appeal fundraising story to engage with supporters through the media. After coming across Charlie Simpson’s tale, they promoted his story through the press. What UNICEF wasn’t expecting, was how the story would then grow into a worldwide phenomenon.

The ‘Charlie Simpson effect’:
•    Caused UNICEF UK’s web traffic to go off the charts after press coverage
•    Was responsible for 30% of UNICEF’s Haiti coverage
•    Galvanised people to support a 7-year old boy to an unprecedented degree, with donations amounting over £208,000 to date
•    Inspired many to come up with their own fundraising initiatives for Haiti – fundraising enquiries went from about 4 a day to 50 a day

Once they realised the scale of its impact, UNICEF made use of the opportunity to get other people fundraising. UNICEF attributed the viral success of Charlie’s story to its authenticity; although @citizensheep pointed out that such fundraising stories also need to tug at the heartstrings in the first place; being a cute kid on a bike certainly helped a lot.

UNICEF’s impressive graphs illustrated the tipping point where Charlie’s fundraiser transformed from local success into global phenomenon. However, the biggest lesson we took from the presentation is when opportunity strikes, be prepared to take advantage of it quickly. You can’t predict when your communication will go viral online, so be ready with all available resources to ride the momentum of a wonderful opportunity.

UNICEF was also kind enough to share that, of their top referring sites during the ‘peak Charlie Simpson period (20 – 30 Jan)’ was Facebook, which accounted for 17% of referrals.  Twitter accounted for just 0.3% of click-throughs – which is clearly not the whole picture in terms of the contribution it will have made.  It was certainly considerably overshadowed by Facebook though, which isn’t really surprising when you compare the difference between user numbers.

View more presentations from NFPtweetup.

British Red Cross and Merlin: Impact of social media on fundraising for Haiti

This joint presentation by British Red Cross and Merlin demonstrated how a larger and smaller charity used social media in an emergency response.  They focused on their Twitter use to illustrate social media upsides and downsides in their Haiti fundraising communication.

According to both charities, social media allows for immediate, high reach, cost-effective and personal engagement. Because it can be done anywhere, people are able to receive updates from locals and aid workers on the ground. This instant spreading of emotional reaction and updates on their progress makes social media incredibly effective in an emergency appeal. Responding to positive and negative comments was essential in their social media use and they felt their use of social media had resulted in much greater levels of brand awareness.

For British Red Cross and Merlin, the downsides of social media engagement include the lack of direct control over what others say about their charities. To protect their brands, both charities view it necessary to monitor and manage comments, which made it time consuming. They also said that the fundraising income generated from social media channels is still minute compared to traditional channels, but that it was too early to expect more.

Some attendees like @calemox and @watfordgap saw the downsides not as weaknesses, but as opportunities. While charities can’t control what people say about them on social media, they are able to nip rumours in the bud at a speed that is very hard to do offline. Social media channels may not have produced spectacular results in terms of fundraising income – yet – but they are fantastic tools when it comes to driving traffic towards charities’ websites.

One of the final slides covered social media management within both charities. Essentially, who’s responsible for ‘doing’ social media is less about which department’s remit it falls under. More important is that whoever does it is actually communicating with people. The key word, as always, is engagement.

Whizz-Kidz: Measuring Social Media Metrics

Last but by no means least, Whizz-Kidz’s Rob Dyson combined honesty and humour for his presentation on social media metrics. Taking us through his journey exploring various free-to-use social media measurement tools, Rob encouraged us to take into account their pluses and minuses to help the other charities attending to figure out what might work for them. Other attendees chipped in with other measurement tools worth trying (also see JustGiving’s notes from the 6th NFPtweetup).

For Whizz-Kidz, Rob monitors social media mentions. This enabled him to identify case studies, as well as people to engage in conversation with – who may or may not be Whizz-Kidz supporters. He suggested spreading the conversations across different networks, and to generate interest for your cause by making the conversations relevant to different audiences in different places.

In Rob’s conclusion, he talked about being selective about what you measure. Learn what’s important for your social media measurement as you go along.

We know that simply being able to measure something isn’t always the same as it being worthwhile, and that the real question is what, within the range of metrics, are the important ones to measure?  Without knowing what you’re trying to achieve, it’s difficult to identify what counts as success – so our advice is always to start with your charity’s or department’s strategic objectives when deciding which activities are important and always to refer measurement back to these objectives, to decide whether you are generating value for your organisation.

Rob also said he believes it’s important not to get hung up on ‘strategy’, since the fluid nature of social media makes communication an art more than an exact science (do you agree?).  For those who are trying to get management buy-in for using social media, Rob’s tip is to keep a record of your social media successes in order to evidence its impact to senior management – which sounded like good advice to us.

The evening came to a close with the launch of Becauseitsgood.org – a third sector community blog started by Enable Interactive, with the aim of encouraging those working in digital communication for the third sector to share ideas and insights to improve the way digital is being used.

Everyone at the 6th NFPtweetup took valuable lessons from the presentations with them and those who were able to stay longer extended their night at the Lord Nelson with conversations probably best left out of this blogpost!  We don’t think we’ve ever seen that many people from so many charities in one pub and it was a lot of fun.

I reckon the 6th NFPtweetup might have been the best one ever – despite a slightly more formal structure than usual.  It’s so successful because it’s so genuinely collaborative.  It takes the efforts of a lot of different people to make it work – the team at beautiful world, sponsorship from Just Giving and, for this event, Enable Interactive, too, Breast Cancer Care for providing the venue, the lovely speakers with their great presentations, as well as all of the attendees in person at the event and online, both sharing thoughts via Twitter. Together, the whole really is greater than the sum of its parts.

Thanks to everyone who made the 6th NFPtweetup a fantastic event. We’re counting on all of you to help us make the 7th NFPtweetup even better – so, if you came along, or followed online, please let us know what you thought by completing our short survey.

Rebekah

P.S. Check out our Flickr gallery to see some photos from the night.

How do you measure social media success?

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

I was lucky enough to grab some rare time with Rebekah to catch up over a sushi dinner recently (sadly no ikura – one of our joint favourite things – but otherwise very good indeed).

Among the things we talked about was a presentation Rebekah was doing on emergency fundraising using social media, as part of her MA, my recent panel at Media140 Third Sector event on 4 February, entitled ‘The Future of Giving’, and the agenda for the next NFPtweetup.

As is so often the case in life, things seemed to be coalescing around a theme, without us really having planned it: charities using social media for fundraising, measuring, quantifying and understanding success and the contributing factors (more of our favourite things). [Many ‘social media experts’ would start talking about ‘serendipity’ at this point, but I’m not going to because it’s adding nothing new to the conversation and the word’s always used incorrectly anyway ;) ]

Anyhow…

I put my panel for Media140 together on fundraising because I wanted to explore social media’s place in fundraising and have an informed debate on our perspectives about such things as emergency fundraising, raising unrestricted funds sustainably, scalability and whether results from fundraising through social media would ever be replicable.

I made that the focus because I felt the sector has surely had it’s fill by now of generic presentations about how brilliant social media are and how charities should be making the most of them, and that there was a real need to elevate the conversation and grapple with some of the real strategic challenges and opportunities, based on quantitative data, and a genuine understanding of fundraising and the financial models of most charities, among other things!

Even on a more tactical level, don’t you agree that we should have moved beyond the ‘cool tools’ conversations by now and be at the point where we’re measuring success, creating benchmarks and at least be able to begin to quantify the value we can generate using social media and share some insights about how to optimise that? I’d hoped the conversation would only start there, before moving on to imagine what fundraising might look like in 5-10 years.

In retrospect, it was probably a bit ambitious for a 40 min session, including questions from the audience, so we didn’t even get halfway there and getting stuck into that is going to have to keep for another time.

What is really worth mentioning is that, in the run up to the event, I had asked representatives from British Red Cross and Merlin to join me on the panel to talk about the support they’d received for their Haiti fundraising appeals through social media – because they’d be able to share some genuine insights into how ‘social fundraising’ compared to the traditional channels they were using, as well as whether they raise funds via social media on any significant scale at times other than emergencies. Sadly, they couldn’t join me at Media140, but they have both agreed to come and speak about this at the next NFPtweetup on 4 March, instead.

We’ll also be joined by UNICEF, who will share how they helped to turn Charlie Simpson’s sponsored bike ride into a fundraising phenomenon, so it should be a great night – and it’s all come together quite nicely around a theme of ‘Generating, and Measuring, Value’, or something like that (it’s still a bit of a working title!).

This seems to be a good point to mention Rebekah’s presentation again, as it was inspired by a press release the DEC released about the role social media played in their Haiti earthquake appeal. I have to say, I thought the presentation so good it would be a shame not to share it more widely, so here it is and over to Rebekah for her perspective:

This presentation was for a class of 15 MA students who didn’t know much about charities and their use of social media. I chose the DEC Haiti earthquake appeal as a case study because the class were familiar with both the disaster and widely publicised appeal. Focusing on DEC’s mobile giving campaign via Twitter, there were examples of how they engaged and encouraged supporters to donate, ending with lessons learnt from the appeal, personal thoughts on the topic and a few questions to kick start class discussion.

I knew it would be hard enough for my classmates to absorb all the new information they were going to be exposed to (most of them don’t have any fundraising experience), but they made a good attempt at giving me considered comments about the questions on the last slide. The final question was left unanswered though:

“Which benchmarks are best to gauge whether or not social media channels make good fundraising tools?”

Maybe the words ‘benchmarks’ and ‘gauge’ made it too scary for my class to approach. Maybe they didn’t feel qualified to offer an opinion on fundraising – which would be quite fair enough. But then I’m not sure the charity sector has managed to answer these questions satisfactorily yet either.

If you’ve got any thoughts to share, please do, and if you’re from a charity and would like to come along to the next NFPtweetup on 4 March and have a good old debate about all of this, tweet me @rebekahhah. We have a few places left, but you’d better be quick!

Rachel and Rebekah

Tough times ahead for Charities

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

So, just what is on the horizon for us in 2010?

There is of course going to be an election (finally!).  Some say it will be as early as March, others that Brown will push it until the last minute in May.

But here’s the thing… it barely matters which party gets elected, they are all going to have to do the same: CUT public spending. Sorry did I say cut? It won’t be called it that.  A phrase like “a radical overhaul of public expenditure” will be used to gloss over it.

Of the multiple, unpleasant effects that this will have, one will be to put more pressure on the third sector to try and deliver the services that government has unofficially washed its hands of.
 
Our fragile economy has been on life-support for the past twelve months. This is about to be switched off and, if it doesn’t just give up the ghost there and then, one of the early consequences is likely to be a rise in unemployment.

Simultaneously taxation, on those lucky enough to have a job, is going to rise steeply.

Net effect: fewer donors with less money in their pockets.

The great challenge to our sector this year will be to meet ever-increasing demands for resources with a falling income.

We are going to have to work incredibly hard to do that.  And we’re going to have to be open to the idea of working differently. The old way of doing things may simply no longer work.

We are entering a period of huge, dinosaur-toppling change.

Online will be more important than ever as charities search for ways to open up new income streams. 
We’re all aware of an explosion in the use of social media (watch out for the  inevitable cack-handed attempts of political parties to do an Obama with it as we head into election fever.)

Many charities have been cocking a suspicious eye towards Twitter and Facebook, and some (Dogs Trust, Adopt-a-Word, Childs-i, Oxfam, RSPB, Amnesty to name but a few) have grasped these new media with both hands.

Some of the more far-sighted charities have been preparing during 2009 by establishing new digital departments. Good move. While the rest of the sector puts a committee together to agree the wording of their first tweet, they will be well placed to start connecting with new supporters online and to begin developing their digital brand identities.

As well as an election there is another tired old contest about to be re-run this year: the World Cup.   Of slightly more interest, if you’re a techie, is the fact that there are apparently millions of 3D TV sets stock-piled for the event.

2010 is definitely going to be a 3D year.  So here’s another prediction: the first 3D TV ad for a charity. (Heck we might even make it ourselves – any takers?)

To summarize, here’s the whole post in one Twitter-sized bite:  CUTS, unemployment up; income down; online v big; huge change; dead dinosaurs; 3D World Cup: England loses.

Charity video – is anyone watching?

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

These days, charities are getting a lot of encouragement to have a video presence on the web. Good thing, too.

YouTube, now the world’s second largest search engine, runs an excellent service for non-profits – with the ability to put links in your video that go directly to your website.  It should definitely be considered as part of an effective SEO strategy – rather than just somewhere to shove old DRTV ads and odds and sods of old footage.  Check out Michael Hoffman’s post on the subject to find out why.

One of the most vocal new promoters of video is See The Difference.  If you haven’t sat through one of their infectiously enthusiastic presentations this year – where have you been?  See The Difference, when it goes live sometime this winter, will be a spectacularly shiny environment, with all sorts of bells and whistles, where you can display your charity’s fundraising videos.

It represents what the web is about: fluid communication that allows you to move intuitively from one interesting thing to another, following your whims and hunches, donating a bit here, a bit there?  The only question that keeps nagging at me is whether donors will bother to go there and look.  I really hope they will, because the demo site is seriously cool.

screen-shot-2009-10-27-at-1226121

But – and there is a big ‘BUT’ – people won’t watch your video unless it is emotionally engaging.  No-one will give to your cause as a result of your film unless you have made a persuasive case.  And no-one will want to watch any video online, no matter how worthy, if it’s long, meandering and doesn’t make an interesting point – and fast.

Doing this is simply not as easy as it looks.

If people have got short attention spans nowadays, there’s nowhere they’re shorter than online. (By the way, the optimum length for an online video is between 3 and 4 minutes.)

A while back I met with some lovely people from a medium-sized charity who had just made a See The Difference do-it-yourself-style film.  They opened the laptop and pressed play.  I watched footage, which ran for several minutes, without any voiceover, then stopped abruptly.

Apart from the missing branding and lack of logo (you might easily be left wondering which charity it featured), the missing case for support (who knows what they were actually going to do with your money?), and the fact that in their film everyone seemed pretty happy and healthy (you do have to illustrate some need when you’re fundraising) – it wasn’t too bad a piece (a bit worthy and dull, but not, you know, awful).

Perhaps these were basic errors that many charities would avoid?  I’m not so sure.

The thing is, charities are often so passionate about the change they create, and so convinced of the need, it often makes them incapable of taking a critical view of their fundraising and realising potential donors might need a bit more persuasion.

But consider this: technology has brought production costs down so much now that making a video is within the reach of just about anybody.  This means more and more people churning out their own mini productions (hence the phenomenal growth of YouTube).

Although that’s great for charities, it’s also going to make it harder and harder for your cause to stand out and be noticed.  And it’s also going to get more and more difficult to persuade the average person to give up three minutes of their life to watch your film, instead of someone else’s – not to mention to watch it and donate.

What’s the solution?  An old one I’m afraid.  Unless you’re an expert yourself, find someone who is.  As media channels have proliferated beyond all recognition, certain things have never gone out of fashion: ideas and craft.

No, you don’t have to spend a fortune on film any longer; a home video camera will do (or even a mobile phone).  But you still have to work damned hard to get someone’s attention.  You still have to think.  You still have to use your imagination.

Frustratingly, this can’t be done with a checklist.  Making a film like that is a bit like painting by numbers – it looks like a painting, but it doesn’t make you feel anything.

Moving images are still the most instantly emotive way to connect with people.  Cleverly used they can make you cry, laugh, gasp with amazement and have you diving for your wallet.

So, remember, while you’re cutting costs, that you still need to invest in the skills required to make this medium sing sweetly.  They’re worth their weight in gold (or pounds sterling!).

Dear Mr Sample

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Not that long ago, if you wanted to make a personal approach to someone, you wrote them a letter.

There’s nothing quite like a letter.  It makes you feel special.  It sounds as if it knows you, about things you’ve done, places you may have been, things you care about.  It feels authentic, civilised and stirs up warm feelings deep within.

screen-shot-2009-10-01-at-1134141

Years ago, when the postman arrived first thing, I used to be genuinely excited to see what he’d brought.  No surprise that a whole industry sprang up with letter writing at its heart: direct mail.

As a schoolboy I learned the power of writing when I, grudgingly, penned my grandmother an inky-fingered thank you letter for her birthday fiver.  The more thank yous I sent, and the more detail I went into about what I’d used her money for, the more fivers she would send back.  Pretty soon I was milking her like a professional.  It’s no wonder that I ended up as a fundraiser.

Now, the post arrives lethargically, around midday, way after I’ve left for work, and I couldn’t be less interested.

So what’s happened?

For one thing, almost nobody under the age of 80 actually writes letters any more.  Instead we prefer email, or the blipvert style of Twitter and Facebook. The envelopes I get are filled mainly with bills, reminders, catalogues and, of course, professionally written begging letters from charities.  Far from being a personal form of communication, the letter has become about as impersonal as you can get.  Little wonder the phrase ‘junk mail’ was coined.

Oh, and those professionally written letters – well (I’m exaggerating to make the point), they all look and sound the same.  The ‘ask’ is always lodged somewhere near the top and repeated at me throughout the letter, lest I should forget what I’ve just read.  There is always a P.S. which reiterates the ‘ask’.  The cause is always urgent (and in bold).  The paper is always unpleasantly cheap and nasty to the touch (ah, the heady days of Basildon Bond).  That term ‘junk’ has been well and truly earned. As for feeling personal and authentic – do me a favour.

So why on earth do we persist in sending mail like this?

Because, surprisingly, it still works. As a method of fundraising there is nothing to beat it – save some kind of once-in-blue-moon TV extravaganza along the lines of Children in Need or Comic Relief.  I saw a mailing from the RSPCA raise over a million pounds earlier this year.  Despite the fact that online is widely understood to be killing print and that the number of letters being posted is plummeting year on year, we are still largely reliant on them as a way of raising funds.

But (there always is one!), although direct mail works, it’s working less and less well.  ROI is down year on year.  Does this mean there’s something fundamentally wrong with the letter?  Is it just because everybody is going online these days?  I don’t think so.  I think it’s us (yes, I take some responsibility).  I think the overall standard of direct mail is getting worse.  And this is driven by an industry-wide belief that the definition of success is doing things as cheaply as possible.

But (good Lord there’s another one!) isn’t Direct Mail by its very nature cheap and cheesy? Jeff Brooks, creative director at Merkle, points out in a post on the Donor Power blog: It’s a near-fatal error in your thinking when your starting point is direct mail is crappy and I wish it would go away. He points out: There’s amazing, empowering, authentic stuff happening in snail-mail every day. Millions of pieces of it. And it’s working. It’s working a lot better than the crappy stuff.

Online evangelists (and I am one) confidently predict that online fundraising will take over – but it’s not going to be a smooth transition.  Charities are going to have to fundamentally revise the way they communicate with their donors.  The whole idea that they somehow ‘own’ donors is likely to fall by the wayside eventually.

In this age of micro-attention spans, the printed word is still hanging in there.  Evidently there is still enough excitement to be gleaned from tearing open an envelope and seeing what’s inside.  Perhaps even just the few moments of peace while you take time to read it.

There’s a real dilemma in all this.  The day is approaching when people will be asked to opt in to receive the unsolicited letters we send them.  If we continue to offer our readers a rubbish diet of the same standard begging letter plus leaflet – how many will bother?

As an industry, we should be trying much harder to stir the imagination, to surprise, to move and to inform people with what we write. We need to dispose of the word ‘junk’ once and for all.  We need to be open to the possibility that spending a bit more to produce something brilliant might be worth it; genuinely worth it – because the ROI will be better, which is the real point.

We should be doing everything we can to invest our letters with pulse-quickening ideas, a sense of poetry and love of language that will make them a real joy to read, as well as trying to cadge a donation.  By the way, shouldn’t we write a little more often without asking for money (it worked wonders with my Grandma)?

Is this a strange point of view for an online zealot like me?  Shouldn’t print just be allowed to die?  I don’t think so.  Not for a second.  It would be a bleak future if there were room for only one form of communication.  After all, variety is the spice of life.

Want to change the world? Get a camera crew.

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

Last night I attended an event called The Goodpitch at Amnesty’s very cool offices in New Inn Yard – just around the corner from beautiful world.

Goodpitch is an inspired idea to bring together what they describe as ‘social-purpose film projects’ (i.e. documentaries) with charities or other organisations whose interests lie in the same area as those explored by each film.

It’s a partnership between Channel 4 BRITDOC Foundation and the Sundance Institute Documentary Film Program in collaboration with Working Films UK.

During the course of the evening, we witnessed a number of case studies including the recent documentary End Of The Line, which has been spectacularly successful in drawing people’s attention to the plight of Bluefin tuna.  The filmmakers had found support, both financial and in kind, from WWF, Greenpeace, and Waitrose among others.

screen-shot-2009-09-08-at-142128

It is a wonderful example of the persuasive power of film. It has spawned a campaign that urges responsible fishing. It posits the serious possibility of an ocean without fish. Why? Because if we don’t take care, we will simply have eaten them all. The film is still in the early days of its release, but it has already prompted Pret a Manger and a number of supermarkets, and restaurants (with the notable exception of Nobu) to completely revise their fish-buying policies in favour of sustainable species.  It has also attracted the attention of political leaders across the world.

The charities that went out on a limb to support the film in its early days of pre-production, at the same time resisting the temptation to try and stamp their polices all over it, deserve huge congratulations for their far-sightedness.  It looks as though it’s already paying off.

At beautiful world we need no convincing that film (and video) can be a hugely effective way to get your message across.  It’s why we consider it an essential part of our offering.  It is no longer prohibitively expensive.  It’s also something I love.  Indeed I’ve been making films and commercials for longer than I’d like to admit (Fancy a 10 minute break? Have a look at my award-winning short: The Mood.)

There is something visceral about the documentary format. It touches people on a deeply emotional level. To borrow a quote from Maya Angelou: “I’ve learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”

If you want to change the world, maybe you should consider making a film about it first – or rather finding someone who already has and riding on the back of that. Or if you’re interested in using video to engage with supporters – give me a call on 0207 739 6136.

Why it’s worth learning to write for Twitter

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

When I look at my Twitter-stream, I find that there are some people whose tweets regularly stand out. They offer a beguiling mix of information and wit that burst onto my screen like verbal fireworks. Beautifully formed thoughts that give the impression of having just rolled effortlessly off the keyboard.

A friend of mine, Mark Wnek, who moved out to The States to become Chief Creative Officer of Lowe NY, is a masterful Twitter writer.  He’s got a brilliant mind, a razor sharp wit and doesn’t suffer fools. His tweets sometimes read like the verbal assaults of an ego-maniac, but they’re always underpinned by self-deprecation and humanity.  Love him or hate him, his tweets are a joy to read. How the hell does he do it?

Well, for starters he’s a copywriter with 25 years experience behind him. A writer who’s taken years to learn his craft.  If you come from a background of press ad and poster writing, you can’t help but feel at home on Twitter.  (The optimum length for a poster headline is 6-8 words.)

For the would-be Mark Twain of Twitter there’s a lesson in this: follow the right people. Make sure you read at least some top quality tweets each day for inspiration.

But, like the spoken word, tweets barely even exist before being swept away by a never-ending torrent of newer posts.  Does it really matter what you write? Well, unless you’re happy talking to yourself, yes it does.

So, what makes a good tweet?

It’s a remarkably difficult question to answer.  Inevitably, it’s a combination of factors: brevity; wit; interesting information; timing; personality.

If you have  established an engaging tone of voice, then a few words from you can have a huge impact.  Stephen Fry, for example, sounds witty saying almost anything.  Easy if you’re him, but since you’re not, you’ll have to work at it.

If you’re tweeting on behalf of your charity, you need to ask yourself:

1. Are your tweets the optimum length?
2. What should the mix of messages be?
3. How often is it okay to ask for support?
4. How do you write a tweet that will get re-tweeted?
5. How do you track your tweets?

(Answers at the end.)

There are some tweeters who come totally left of field.  One of my favourites is Drsamueljohnson.  He (or she?) writes every tweet in the style of the esteemed 18th century author.  Believe it or not, it works.  The tweets are unmistakable and often hilarious.

picture-1

One of the ways to become a good writer on Twitter is to become a good listener.  What I mean by this is learning to spot subtext.

There is a constant stream of people ready to denounce Twitter for being banal.  Even Ken Burnett recently, rather wickedly, described Twitter as ‘drowning in a sea of trivia’.  He was being deliberately provocative, I know, but the point I want to make back to Ken is: learn to read between the lines, you’ll get a lot more out of it.

For example, I saw a tweet the other day from someone who’s a real social media ‘pro’, which read (I’m paraphrasing):

“Goodness it’s 3.30, where has the time gone?”

Can you get more trivial than this?

Think about it again.

This is a guy who keeps up a pretty constant stream of tweets and has a huge following.  He’s been off air for hours.  His tweet is telling me that he’s back (sorry if he ignored me in the interval); he’s telling me that he’s up for a chat; he’s telling me that he’s been incredibly busy; he’s saying hello.  Trivial?  I don’t think so.

There is another reason it’s worth honing your craft when it comes to Twitter writing.  It will make you a better writer – period.  Being brief, concise, witty, attractive and informative all leads to writing that is more effective.  If you can write for Twitter, you can write for anything.

Now, back to those questions I posed earlier.  You can get the answers to all of them, plus a whole heap of really useful tips, at Writing For Twitter, the course I’m running on 5th October.  Hope to see you there.

Cheapskate Cliff Richard Fans

Monday, August 10th, 2009

What’s wrong with the following statement?

“We are mailing half as many people this time round, so we need to halve the income target”

Now, I guess that sounds entirely reasonable, but in fact, it isn’t.

If the number of people you mailed was in a direct proportion to the number of people that responded, then it would indeed make total sense. But fundraising doesn’t work that way. Why?

Let’s say I ask this question:

“Who wants a free ticket to see Cliff Richard?”

sircliff

There is a finite number of people who would be interested in this question. Some people would probably take you up because it is free; some people would take it up because it is Cliff Richard; and some people would take it up because it’s free AND it’s Cliff. We have three distinct groups here:

  • Cheapskates
  • Cliff Richard Fans
  • Cheapskate Cliff Richard Fans

The best responders will naturally be those who admire Sir Cliff and like free tickets. That’s a reasonable expectation because this offer is, like, ‘so totally up their street’.

There is a finite number of people who are ever likely to take you up on your offer – whatever that offer is.

Response rates are funny things. I could, for example, get you a 100% response rate by only asking myself and responding. However, that would just be me and Sir Cliff, which would be pretty uncomfortable for us both.

If you had the money, you could also contact everyone in the whole country. You would certainly have asked all the right people, plus a whole lot more.  But the point remains – it’s only going to be people in those three groups who are ever likely to respond. Of course, you’d get a few randoms… people who were just passing, some lost tourists and the like, but they are going to be in the minority. However, even including this minority, the number of people interested in your offer is finite.

So what is wrong with the original statement?

The point is you need to optimize your outbound communications. Doing anything else results in what some people call junk mail. It is also what I call a terrible waste of money and you shouldn’t do it.

Regardless of that, at some point, you will hit the maximum number of people who are ever going to take you up on your free Cliff ticket.

I’m going to take the next section very slowly. Simon, who’s almost allergic to numbers and is looking pretty blank at the moment, is my litmus test. If he gets this bit, anyone can.

The relationship between the volume compared to response is not linear, it starts getting further and further apart the more people you contact.

(Simon’s nodding doubtfully).

In other words you’ll get a worse and worse response rate, while the costs go up and up.  Knowing how and when to judge this optimum point is a real skill. When you hit it just right – you can get some brilliant results. The nifty thing here is that when judgement is applied in this area by someone who knows what they’re doing (alright I am talking about me, not Simon), you not only get brilliant results, but you know in advance that you’re likely to get these kind of results. They’re wonderfully predictable.  You can’t predict what one person will do, but you can predict what 10,000 people will do.

Far from reducing your income target, you could well be in a position to increase your income at the same time as you cut your costs. It is possible to achieve a greater net income by asking half as many people, as long as you cut out the half that was not likely to respond.

(Nod and a wink from Simon.)

So if, by some curious twist of fate, you actually are wondering who to contact to get rid of a barrel load of free Cliff Richard tickets, the answer is: cheapskate Cliff Richard fans.

An open letter to the next beautiful intern

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Dear next beautiful intern,

Since today’s my last day at Beautiful World and you have yet to start work, this letter is the best way I could think of to do some kind of a handover to you.

I won’t be going through all the ins and outs of working here. The partners of Beautiful World don’t suffer fools gladly and they all come with built-in bullshit detectors. That’s why I’m confident whoever they pick as the next intern will be a pretty clued up person to figure it all out.

What I will do is flesh out my version of the beautiful intern specification and share some of my experience, in the hope that you can use it to make the most out of your time here.

First of all, you have to bring something to the table, like an opinion. If it also makes the partners laugh, it’s a real treat. Their laughter is infectious and it’s the best thing you could hear in the agency, other than news of winning pitches, raising millions for good causes and getting paid.

Therefore, having a sense of humour helps tremendously, because working for the greater good does make you want to tear your hair out sometimes.  Add to that bags of unwavering enthusiasm and you will never lose sight of why you’re really here.

Take initiative. Roll up your sleeves and do as much work as is humanly possible. When you’re done, ask for more. While the partners can do the tasks given to you much better and faster than you can, they sometimes forget that they have way too much on their plate. You’re here to help, so help them. You’re also here to learn, and I guarantee you’ll learn a lot by getting stuck in.

The great thing about working in Beautiful World is that you even get to run a few ideas of your own. If it wasn’t for me, the beautiful pouffe would still be called a footstool.

RHah

Other very useful skills to have are great attention to detail, being highly organised and super efficient, as well as making a gorgeous cup of tea/coffee.

Upon reflection, here are a few highlights from my experience:

Best moments
I know it sounds cliché, but it has to be everyday at Beautiful World. There aren’t many places where you go to work happy and leave work happy, so I’m one very lucky intern.

Greatest challenge
Deciphering Rachel’s handwritten notes.

Biggest regret
Making horrendous coffee for our beautiful visitors. It’s a fact I’ve learnt only recently and I fear the coffee could have been the deal breaker for some of our new business pitches. The partners might have to invest in a ‘million pound coffee maker’. No wait, that’s Adam.

What I’ve learnt
The past few times I’ve been asked the all important question, I couldn’t give a straight answer. I can only hope the words ‘muppet’ and ‘tosser’ didn’t spring to mind.

Some key discoveries:

  • The kettle takes years to boil
  • Chas and Dave
  • ‘Quick’ and ‘dirty’ are words you can also use to describe data

In all seriousness, I’ve learnt more than just recency, frequency, value and not to mention, propensity models.   A lot of what I take from the internship is through observing how the partners all work together and how effective they are in conjuring up really great solutions for the challenges that clients have.  It’s been a great eye-opener and a huge inspiration for me to do the same, if not better.

I’m really grateful to have had the chance to work with the partners of Beautiful World, and to Simon for relinquishing creative control over this letter. They’re really nice people and I know you’ll like them as much as I do.

I do hope that I’ve left Beautiful World a little bit better, more organised and a livelier place to work in and my wish for you is that you will make Beautiful World better in your own way too.

Finally, if any of the partners threaten to superglue you to your chair at the end of your internship to keep you here, it might not be such a bad idea to say yes to that.

Sincerely,

Rebekah

Is fundraising becoming a dirty word?

Monday, July 27th, 2009

So here I am, sitting down to a meeting with another potential beautiful client and we’re doing the introductions.

The guy to my left is in charge of ‘Supporter Retention’ (not development, just retention?). The lady to my right looks after ‘Supporter Acquisition’.  Chairing the meeting is the Head of Supporter Relationship Marketing.

A couple of days before that, I was in a meeting with someone whose job title was ‘Individual Giving Officer – Acquisition’ and, recently, with someone else in charge of ‘Supporter Marketing’. A week or two ago I met a Head of Supporter Services, who was actually the head of the Individual Giving function at that particular charity.

In fact, all of these good people are fundraisers.

Back at the beautiful office, we began to wonder, is this a little like bin men becoming waste removal engineers?  Or how about the window cleaner who is now a vision clearance executive? And the coffee guy who has become a barista?

Perhaps this rash of obscure job titles is symptomatic of a deeper issue? Are charities (at least some of them) becoming embarrassed at the idea of asking for money?

Could part of the reason be the proliferation of ‘social media experts’ flooding into the sector offering charities advice? These self-proclaimed gurus, many of whom have little or no fundraising experience, sell a beguiling dream of online social communities coalescing around charities and good causes in a beatific haze of generosity. Nothing as crude as asking for money need ever happen, if you engage in a dialogue with them, people will just give…

The hell they will.

You won’t find corporate fundraisers pussy-footing around the idea of asking for money. They’d be out of a job. The same applies to Major Donor Fundraisers. (Note the word fundraisers in the job title.) You know exactly what they want when you’ve had a conversation with one of these people, and so does your bank manager.

A creative director who once made my life a misery hammered home a very good piece of advice when it comes to charities and donors: tell people what the problem is, and tell them what you want them to do about it. You want money? Just ask.
picture-2
Very few people put their hands in their pockets on the basis of a hint. Time after time, one of the top reasons donors cite for giving is, simply: ‘I was asked’.

Let’s not be embarrassed to be fundraisers. It’s a noble profession.

Beautiful internship

Friday, July 24th, 2009

We have this wonderful intern.  She’s bright, ruthlessly efficient, a real pleasure to have around.

She’s learned about fundraising and marketing, and loads about data analysis, since she’s been with us.

There’s only one problem: she’s leaving to do an MA.

Know anyone who could replace her?

Email: rachel@hellobeautifulworld.com

home
clients
work
what we do
people
events
blog
press
jobs
contact

Charities Charity Facebook Fundraising Just Giving NFPtweetup non-profit online social media Twitter
RSS Feed

connect with us:

beautiful world on Twitter
beautiful world on Facebook
beautiful world on Flickr
beautiful world on Posterous