Posts Tagged ‘Fundraising’

NFPtweetup seven session preview: Whizz-Kidz social media overview and update

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Those who came to the last NFPtweetup on 4 March are sure to remember Rob Dyson’s presentation on the first steps he had taken to monitor and measure the impact of Whizz-Kidz social media engagement. If you missed it, you missed out on Rob’s uniquely engaging and humourous delivery, but you can still see his slides on slideshare:

In our fifth blog post in the run up to NFPtweetup on Thursday, we hear from Rob, Pam and Jess from Whizz-Kidz with a preview of the update they will be giving us on Whizz-Kidz social media journey, including some of the tactics they use to engage with events fundraisers:

At youth mobility charity Whizz-Kidz we’ve been steadily increasing our social media and real-time web use over the last 18 months; trying and testing different platforms for different communications with our supporters and users.

However it’s only recently that we’ve really begun to evaluate and measure the reach of this experimentation. Pleasingly, the feedback and engagement levels kind of shows that, erm, we’re not experimenting anymore; we’re actually getting rather good at it.

There’s no room for complacency though, and there is constant demand for innovation in terms of how we harness our supporters, and importantly, how we subscribe more people to our bottom line: donating or fundraising so we can support more young disabled people year on year.

At the NFPtweetup on 10 June, we’ll be giving a brief overview of what works for us (it may not work for you).

Specifically:

Having a Facebook profile as a person – “Jess Whizz Kidz”, has proven an incredibly popular way to engage with our London Marathon runners. Participants may not always pick up the phone, but they do like using Facebook: you’re on their turf and building great relationships. Plus it’s on a Facebook wall (not stuck in an email) so can be shared, added to, and built upon by other runners.

Twitter is a fantastic viral tool, so we use it when we want to get messages out quickly and to a wide audience – we have loyal ambassadors who retweet us. We also talk a lot – chat, converse, ask questions and have discussions. We make friends.

YouTube (promoted via Facebook and Twitter) is the bees knees when wanting to paint a picture of the impact of our work. We have a growing portfolio of videos made by our young people telling their own stories, in their own words.

We hope you get some ideas from our short session, and we’re looking forward to hearing your successes to! We’re all learning.

Rob Dyson, PR & social media Manager – @robmdyson & @whizzkidz;
Pam O’Brien, Events Fundraising Manager;
Jess Leigh, London Marathon Project Manager and Events Fundraiser – @whizzkidzevents
Whizz-Kidz

NFPtweetup seven session preview: Dogs Trust and Twibbon fundraising

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

Many in the sector still seem to doubt that social media can be used for fundraising – in large part because there are so few examples of charities having tried – so we’re really lucky that Jacqui O’Beirne of Dogs Trust will be sharing the results of Dogs Trust’s Twibbon fundraising experiment at next week’s NFPtweetup. In our third blog post to warm up for the event, Jacqui gives us a sneak preview of what she’ll be sharing:

Dogs Trust, as most of you know, are sometimes heralded as the ‘best practice’ for NFP social media, and while we love that tag there was always a missing element for us that niggled – we never raised any money. We rehomed loads of dogs, which is our charity aim, but we never had a figure in our income column come month end.

We went into social media as a communications tool, not a fundraising one, but sitting in department of 30 others who are raising money made us feel a bit inferior.

So, never ones to pass up an opportunity, when JustGiving and Twibbon approached us about being their guinea pig for a product they were launching how could we say no?!

At next week’s NFPtweetup I’ll be sharing the results and learnings from our Valentines Day Twibbon Experiment, as well as answering any questions you may have about our work online.

See you all there!

Jacqui

Digital Marketing Manager
Dogs Trust
@jacquiobeirne @dogstrust

RNIB moves into online fundraising

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

The RNIB was keen to make its first foray into online fundraising, to begin testing propositions, treatments and media to provide learning and benchmarks to form the basis of a new donor acquisition programme.

We designed a series of display ads, to run across a number of media properties and placements. These were based on (more…)

Diabetes UK

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

New year’s resolutions Diabetes UK style


Diabetes UK has built an award winning fundraising site: Challenge|Diabetes UK and asked us to create a series of online banners to drive people to it.

This campaign ran after Christmas, and throughout January, to coincide with the time people make their New Year’s Resolutions.

The banners invited you to set yourself a challenge – anything from swimming 100 laps, to losing a turkey in weight, to dancing for a hour – and then raise funds by asking your friends and family to donate and sponsor you to achieve your personal goal.

The magenta colouring helped the banners stand out from the page even at the smallest size, whilst the low-fi animation style worked in contrast to the conventional finish of most of the other display advertising.

The principle behind these ads is visual disruption – they disturb the eye and draw you to them. This approach was very successful in driving traffic to the Challenge site and further ads are planned later in the year.

Forecasting the future of the RSPCA

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

We have just presented the first iteration of a 5-year budget and forecasting model to RSPCA.

This is a groundbreaking project that has involved the analysis of some 60 million transactions going back over the past 5 years.

It will allow RSPCA to see clearly where to invest budget to achieve the best return on investment, in the short, medium and long-term, and enable the charity to forecast the impact on income whenever key performance indicators are exceeded or missed, and respond accordingly, to ensure the ongoing financial security of the charity.

Christmas appeal for The Children’s Society

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

001-tcspackshot

This piece is based around the idea of a children’s story for grown-ups. It features a beautifully-illustrated booklet, with seemingly cute pictures contrasted against the harsh story of a teenage runaway:

tcspackshot1

It’s not easy to fundraise for teenagers – even with a case study as deserving as Sophie’s, that featured in the pack. The children’s illustrations in the storybook deliberately take the reader back to the nursery – a much easier place to stir sympathy.

004-tcspackshot

005-tcspackshot006-tcspackshot007-tcspackshot1

The overall thrust of the pack is uplifting. It asks you not to dwell on the the things that Sophie has done – those were the actions of a deeply upset child crying out for help – but rather to think of the person that, with your help, Sophie can become.

Jewish Care

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

picture-41

Most people automatically zone out of any part of a newspaper page showing an advertisement.

This simple, type-led execution about dementia has an interactive hook.  Words are sliced out of the copy, illustrating the effect of dementia on the brain.  The reader is forced to track down the missing words to get the full sense of the ad.

People don’t like ads.  They do like puzzles.

Fundraising work of unparalleled genius

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

The other day I got pleasant surprise in the form of an email from Sofii – a website set up by Ken Burnett as “The Showcase of Fundraising Innovation and Inspiration.”

The email features a best of the best list of work since Sofii was set up.  The item that brought a smile to my face was the RSPB brand stretch campaign I did when I was creative director of Cascaid (an agency now no longer with us).  I’d love to take all the credit, but I had help, notably from a very stylish art director (take a bow Angela Coster) and a clever writer (Selina Heathcote).

There is a great deal more to the RSPB than bird watching – it’s Europe’s biggest conservation society.  It protects huge swathes of British countryside, advises more than one government on matters such as climate change, fish stocks and coastal protection.  It is responsible for projects of breath-taking scale – it bought the logging rights to a rainforest in order not to log it, but to let it grow back to its former glory over the next hundred years or so.  How many charities could conceive a project that huge?

When we met, the RSPB had realised that, in order to grow its membership, it would have to grow public understanding of what it does.  In other words, how do you get normal people to join an organisation full of twitchers?

Our solution was a campaign that focused on those special times when nature unexpectedly intrudes on your life.  We called it an RSPB moment.  It could be an amazing sunset, the sighting of an urban fox, a special tree, a child’s fascination with an insect, or (of course) an encounter with a bird.  We made extensive use of the RSPB’s fabulous picture library – and the work that followed was simply breathtaking. Each ad, or mail-pack, was a moment in itself.

We took this thought into direct mail, press ads and online. People were invited to share their moments with each other on a microsite. The outpouring that followed was overwhelming. The moment’s campaign had touched a real nerve.

The stories that people gave us were funny, inspiring and at times very moving. For example, the woman who had gone profoundly deaf suddenly discovering that she could hear again from the cries of a kestrel hovering over her doorstep.

Sofii does what it says on the tin.  It showcases examples of great fundraising work, mostly from the present, but every so often it includes some real gems from the past where the thinking is still tellingly relevant.

IIf you’re wondering about the other featured work, have a look: WWF Canada, Amnesty, Dogs Trust, Oxfam, Breakthrough India, Agnes Holliday and Rebecca Brown, Station WNED, Muscular Dystrophy Group, and St Paul.

Anyone considering a career in fundraising would be instantly seduced by the work they saw on Sofii.  More importantly, so would (and were) donors.  The question is, why don’t we see work of this standard being produced more often by agencies and their clients?

Truth is we all try, but it’s harder than it looks.  The more people who get involved, the harder it becomes.  Every so often, all the right elements come together – right clients, right work, right time – and you end up with something exhilarating and wonderful. Sometimes I think we’re a little like surfers waiting for the perfect wave, enthused by the memory of the almost perfect one that came before.

The 6th #NFPtweetup round-up

Monday, March 8th, 2010

We had a fantastic 6th NFPtweetup at Breast Cancer Care last Thursday (check our posterous for the briefest summary).  So, before the night’s memories and #NFPtweetup mentions fade, I thought I’d try to capture the essence of it here:

The 6th event felt like it began long before it did, with an outpouring of excitement via Twitter as people made their way to the venue and those who could not attend in person expressing their disappointment in 140 characters.

After the t-shirt competition winners, @PontoonDock, @amyrsward, @HaveFunDoGood and special prize winner @RochelleDancel received their t-shirts, the event carried on with three great presentations:

UNICEF: Charlie Simpson – A media sensation

UNICEF were looking for a positive, UK based, Haiti appeal fundraising story to engage with supporters through the media. After coming across Charlie Simpson’s tale, they promoted his story through the press. What UNICEF wasn’t expecting, was how the story would then grow into a worldwide phenomenon.

The ‘Charlie Simpson effect’:
•    Caused UNICEF UK’s web traffic to go off the charts after press coverage
•    Was responsible for 30% of UNICEF’s Haiti coverage
•    Galvanised people to support a 7-year old boy to an unprecedented degree, with donations amounting over £208,000 to date
•    Inspired many to come up with their own fundraising initiatives for Haiti – fundraising enquiries went from about 4 a day to 50 a day

Once they realised the scale of its impact, UNICEF made use of the opportunity to get other people fundraising. UNICEF attributed the viral success of Charlie’s story to its authenticity; although @citizensheep pointed out that such fundraising stories also need to tug at the heartstrings in the first place; being a cute kid on a bike certainly helped a lot.

UNICEF’s impressive graphs illustrated the tipping point where Charlie’s fundraiser transformed from local success into global phenomenon. However, the biggest lesson we took from the presentation is when opportunity strikes, be prepared to take advantage of it quickly. You can’t predict when your communication will go viral online, so be ready with all available resources to ride the momentum of a wonderful opportunity.

UNICEF was also kind enough to share that, of their top referring sites during the ‘peak Charlie Simpson period (20 – 30 Jan)’ was Facebook, which accounted for 17% of referrals.  Twitter accounted for just 0.3% of click-throughs – which is clearly not the whole picture in terms of the contribution it will have made.  It was certainly considerably overshadowed by Facebook though, which isn’t really surprising when you compare the difference between user numbers.

View more presentations from NFPtweetup.

British Red Cross and Merlin: Impact of social media on fundraising for Haiti

This joint presentation by British Red Cross and Merlin demonstrated how a larger and smaller charity used social media in an emergency response.  They focused on their Twitter use to illustrate social media upsides and downsides in their Haiti fundraising communication.

According to both charities, social media allows for immediate, high reach, cost-effective and personal engagement. Because it can be done anywhere, people are able to receive updates from locals and aid workers on the ground. This instant spreading of emotional reaction and updates on their progress makes social media incredibly effective in an emergency appeal. Responding to positive and negative comments was essential in their social media use and they felt their use of social media had resulted in much greater levels of brand awareness.

For British Red Cross and Merlin, the downsides of social media engagement include the lack of direct control over what others say about their charities. To protect their brands, both charities view it necessary to monitor and manage comments, which made it time consuming. They also said that the fundraising income generated from social media channels is still minute compared to traditional channels, but that it was too early to expect more.

Some attendees like @calemox and @watfordgap saw the downsides not as weaknesses, but as opportunities. While charities can’t control what people say about them on social media, they are able to nip rumours in the bud at a speed that is very hard to do offline. Social media channels may not have produced spectacular results in terms of fundraising income – yet – but they are fantastic tools when it comes to driving traffic towards charities’ websites.

One of the final slides covered social media management within both charities. Essentially, who’s responsible for ‘doing’ social media is less about which department’s remit it falls under. More important is that whoever does it is actually communicating with people. The key word, as always, is engagement.

Whizz-Kidz: Measuring Social Media Metrics

Last but by no means least, Whizz-Kidz’s Rob Dyson combined honesty and humour for his presentation on social media metrics. Taking us through his journey exploring various free-to-use social media measurement tools, Rob encouraged us to take into account their pluses and minuses to help the other charities attending to figure out what might work for them. Other attendees chipped in with other measurement tools worth trying (also see JustGiving’s notes from the 6th NFPtweetup).

For Whizz-Kidz, Rob monitors social media mentions. This enabled him to identify case studies, as well as people to engage in conversation with – who may or may not be Whizz-Kidz supporters. He suggested spreading the conversations across different networks, and to generate interest for your cause by making the conversations relevant to different audiences in different places.

In Rob’s conclusion, he talked about being selective about what you measure. Learn what’s important for your social media measurement as you go along.

We know that simply being able to measure something isn’t always the same as it being worthwhile, and that the real question is what, within the range of metrics, are the important ones to measure?  Without knowing what you’re trying to achieve, it’s difficult to identify what counts as success – so our advice is always to start with your charity’s or department’s strategic objectives when deciding which activities are important and always to refer measurement back to these objectives, to decide whether you are generating value for your organisation.

Rob also said he believes it’s important not to get hung up on ‘strategy’, since the fluid nature of social media makes communication an art more than an exact science (do you agree?).  For those who are trying to get management buy-in for using social media, Rob’s tip is to keep a record of your social media successes in order to evidence its impact to senior management – which sounded like good advice to us.

The evening came to a close with the launch of Becauseitsgood.org – a third sector community blog started by Enable Interactive, with the aim of encouraging those working in digital communication for the third sector to share ideas and insights to improve the way digital is being used.

Everyone at the 6th NFPtweetup took valuable lessons from the presentations with them and those who were able to stay longer extended their night at the Lord Nelson with conversations probably best left out of this blogpost!  We don’t think we’ve ever seen that many people from so many charities in one pub and it was a lot of fun.

I reckon the 6th NFPtweetup might have been the best one ever – despite a slightly more formal structure than usual.  It’s so successful because it’s so genuinely collaborative.  It takes the efforts of a lot of different people to make it work – the team at beautiful world, sponsorship from Just Giving and, for this event, Enable Interactive, too, Breast Cancer Care for providing the venue, the lovely speakers with their great presentations, as well as all of the attendees in person at the event and online, both sharing thoughts via Twitter. Together, the whole really is greater than the sum of its parts.

Thanks to everyone who made the 6th NFPtweetup a fantastic event. We’re counting on all of you to help us make the 7th NFPtweetup even better – so, if you came along, or followed online, please let us know what you thought by completing our short survey.

Rebekah

P.S. Check out our Flickr gallery to see some photos from the night.

How do you measure social media success?

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

I was lucky enough to grab some rare time with Rebekah to catch up over a sushi dinner recently (sadly no ikura – one of our joint favourite things – but otherwise very good indeed).

Among the things we talked about was a presentation Rebekah was doing on emergency fundraising using social media, as part of her MA, my recent panel at Media140 Third Sector event on 4 February, entitled ‘The Future of Giving’, and the agenda for the next NFPtweetup.

As is so often the case in life, things seemed to be coalescing around a theme, without us really having planned it: charities using social media for fundraising, measuring, quantifying and understanding success and the contributing factors (more of our favourite things). [Many ‘social media experts’ would start talking about ‘serendipity’ at this point, but I’m not going to because it’s adding nothing new to the conversation and the word’s always used incorrectly anyway ;) ]

Anyhow…

I put my panel for Media140 together on fundraising because I wanted to explore social media’s place in fundraising and have an informed debate on our perspectives about such things as emergency fundraising, raising unrestricted funds sustainably, scalability and whether results from fundraising through social media would ever be replicable.

I made that the focus because I felt the sector has surely had it’s fill by now of generic presentations about how brilliant social media are and how charities should be making the most of them, and that there was a real need to elevate the conversation and grapple with some of the real strategic challenges and opportunities, based on quantitative data, and a genuine understanding of fundraising and the financial models of most charities, among other things!

Even on a more tactical level, don’t you agree that we should have moved beyond the ‘cool tools’ conversations by now and be at the point where we’re measuring success, creating benchmarks and at least be able to begin to quantify the value we can generate using social media and share some insights about how to optimise that? I’d hoped the conversation would only start there, before moving on to imagine what fundraising might look like in 5-10 years.

In retrospect, it was probably a bit ambitious for a 40 min session, including questions from the audience, so we didn’t even get halfway there and getting stuck into that is going to have to keep for another time.

What is really worth mentioning is that, in the run up to the event, I had asked representatives from British Red Cross and Merlin to join me on the panel to talk about the support they’d received for their Haiti fundraising appeals through social media – because they’d be able to share some genuine insights into how ‘social fundraising’ compared to the traditional channels they were using, as well as whether they raise funds via social media on any significant scale at times other than emergencies. Sadly, they couldn’t join me at Media140, but they have both agreed to come and speak about this at the next NFPtweetup on 4 March, instead.

We’ll also be joined by UNICEF, who will share how they helped to turn Charlie Simpson’s sponsored bike ride into a fundraising phenomenon, so it should be a great night – and it’s all come together quite nicely around a theme of ‘Generating, and Measuring, Value’, or something like that (it’s still a bit of a working title!).

This seems to be a good point to mention Rebekah’s presentation again, as it was inspired by a press release the DEC released about the role social media played in their Haiti earthquake appeal. I have to say, I thought the presentation so good it would be a shame not to share it more widely, so here it is and over to Rebekah for her perspective:

This presentation was for a class of 15 MA students who didn’t know much about charities and their use of social media. I chose the DEC Haiti earthquake appeal as a case study because the class were familiar with both the disaster and widely publicised appeal. Focusing on DEC’s mobile giving campaign via Twitter, there were examples of how they engaged and encouraged supporters to donate, ending with lessons learnt from the appeal, personal thoughts on the topic and a few questions to kick start class discussion.

I knew it would be hard enough for my classmates to absorb all the new information they were going to be exposed to (most of them don’t have any fundraising experience), but they made a good attempt at giving me considered comments about the questions on the last slide. The final question was left unanswered though:

“Which benchmarks are best to gauge whether or not social media channels make good fundraising tools?”

Maybe the words ‘benchmarks’ and ‘gauge’ made it too scary for my class to approach. Maybe they didn’t feel qualified to offer an opinion on fundraising – which would be quite fair enough. But then I’m not sure the charity sector has managed to answer these questions satisfactorily yet either.

If you’ve got any thoughts to share, please do, and if you’re from a charity and would like to come along to the next NFPtweetup on 4 March and have a good old debate about all of this, tweet me @rebekahhah. We have a few places left, but you’d better be quick!

Rachel and Rebekah

Charity video – is anyone watching?

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

These days, charities are getting a lot of encouragement to have a video presence on the web. Good thing, too.

YouTube, now the world’s second largest search engine, runs an excellent service for non-profits – with the ability to put links in your video that go directly to your website.  It should definitely be considered as part of an effective SEO strategy – rather than just somewhere to shove old DRTV ads and odds and sods of old footage.  Check out Michael Hoffman’s post on the subject to find out why.

One of the most vocal new promoters of video is See The Difference.  If you haven’t sat through one of their infectiously enthusiastic presentations this year – where have you been?  See The Difference, when it goes live sometime this winter, will be a spectacularly shiny environment, with all sorts of bells and whistles, where you can display your charity’s fundraising videos.

It represents what the web is about: fluid communication that allows you to move intuitively from one interesting thing to another, following your whims and hunches, donating a bit here, a bit there?  The only question that keeps nagging at me is whether donors will bother to go there and look.  I really hope they will, because the demo site is seriously cool.

screen-shot-2009-10-27-at-1226121

But – and there is a big ‘BUT’ – people won’t watch your video unless it is emotionally engaging.  No-one will give to your cause as a result of your film unless you have made a persuasive case.  And no-one will want to watch any video online, no matter how worthy, if it’s long, meandering and doesn’t make an interesting point – and fast.

Doing this is simply not as easy as it looks.

If people have got short attention spans nowadays, there’s nowhere they’re shorter than online. (By the way, the optimum length for an online video is between 3 and 4 minutes.)

A while back I met with some lovely people from a medium-sized charity who had just made a See The Difference do-it-yourself-style film.  They opened the laptop and pressed play.  I watched footage, which ran for several minutes, without any voiceover, then stopped abruptly.

Apart from the missing branding and lack of logo (you might easily be left wondering which charity it featured), the missing case for support (who knows what they were actually going to do with your money?), and the fact that in their film everyone seemed pretty happy and healthy (you do have to illustrate some need when you’re fundraising) – it wasn’t too bad a piece (a bit worthy and dull, but not, you know, awful).

Perhaps these were basic errors that many charities would avoid?  I’m not so sure.

The thing is, charities are often so passionate about the change they create, and so convinced of the need, it often makes them incapable of taking a critical view of their fundraising and realising potential donors might need a bit more persuasion.

But consider this: technology has brought production costs down so much now that making a video is within the reach of just about anybody.  This means more and more people churning out their own mini productions (hence the phenomenal growth of YouTube).

Although that’s great for charities, it’s also going to make it harder and harder for your cause to stand out and be noticed.  And it’s also going to get more and more difficult to persuade the average person to give up three minutes of their life to watch your film, instead of someone else’s – not to mention to watch it and donate.

What’s the solution?  An old one I’m afraid.  Unless you’re an expert yourself, find someone who is.  As media channels have proliferated beyond all recognition, certain things have never gone out of fashion: ideas and craft.

No, you don’t have to spend a fortune on film any longer; a home video camera will do (or even a mobile phone).  But you still have to work damned hard to get someone’s attention.  You still have to think.  You still have to use your imagination.

Frustratingly, this can’t be done with a checklist.  Making a film like that is a bit like painting by numbers – it looks like a painting, but it doesn’t make you feel anything.

Moving images are still the most instantly emotive way to connect with people.  Cleverly used they can make you cry, laugh, gasp with amazement and have you diving for your wallet.

So, remember, while you’re cutting costs, that you still need to invest in the skills required to make this medium sing sweetly.  They’re worth their weight in gold (or pounds sterling!).

Dear Mr Sample

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Not that long ago, if you wanted to make a personal approach to someone, you wrote them a letter.

There’s nothing quite like a letter.  It makes you feel special.  It sounds as if it knows you, about things you’ve done, places you may have been, things you care about.  It feels authentic, civilised and stirs up warm feelings deep within.

screen-shot-2009-10-01-at-1134141

Years ago, when the postman arrived first thing, I used to be genuinely excited to see what he’d brought.  No surprise that a whole industry sprang up with letter writing at its heart: direct mail.

As a schoolboy I learned the power of writing when I, grudgingly, penned my grandmother an inky-fingered thank you letter for her birthday fiver.  The more thank yous I sent, and the more detail I went into about what I’d used her money for, the more fivers she would send back.  Pretty soon I was milking her like a professional.  It’s no wonder that I ended up as a fundraiser.

Now, the post arrives lethargically, around midday, way after I’ve left for work, and I couldn’t be less interested.

So what’s happened?

For one thing, almost nobody under the age of 80 actually writes letters any more.  Instead we prefer email, or the blipvert style of Twitter and Facebook. The envelopes I get are filled mainly with bills, reminders, catalogues and, of course, professionally written begging letters from charities.  Far from being a personal form of communication, the letter has become about as impersonal as you can get.  Little wonder the phrase ‘junk mail’ was coined.

Oh, and those professionally written letters – well (I’m exaggerating to make the point), they all look and sound the same.  The ‘ask’ is always lodged somewhere near the top and repeated at me throughout the letter, lest I should forget what I’ve just read.  There is always a P.S. which reiterates the ‘ask’.  The cause is always urgent (and in bold).  The paper is always unpleasantly cheap and nasty to the touch (ah, the heady days of Basildon Bond).  That term ‘junk’ has been well and truly earned. As for feeling personal and authentic – do me a favour.

So why on earth do we persist in sending mail like this?

Because, surprisingly, it still works. As a method of fundraising there is nothing to beat it – save some kind of once-in-blue-moon TV extravaganza along the lines of Children in Need or Comic Relief.  I saw a mailing from the RSPCA raise over a million pounds earlier this year.  Despite the fact that online is widely understood to be killing print and that the number of letters being posted is plummeting year on year, we are still largely reliant on them as a way of raising funds.

But (there always is one!), although direct mail works, it’s working less and less well.  ROI is down year on year.  Does this mean there’s something fundamentally wrong with the letter?  Is it just because everybody is going online these days?  I don’t think so.  I think it’s us (yes, I take some responsibility).  I think the overall standard of direct mail is getting worse.  And this is driven by an industry-wide belief that the definition of success is doing things as cheaply as possible.

But (good Lord there’s another one!) isn’t Direct Mail by its very nature cheap and cheesy? Jeff Brooks, creative director at Merkle, points out in a post on the Donor Power blog: It’s a near-fatal error in your thinking when your starting point is direct mail is crappy and I wish it would go away. He points out: There’s amazing, empowering, authentic stuff happening in snail-mail every day. Millions of pieces of it. And it’s working. It’s working a lot better than the crappy stuff.

Online evangelists (and I am one) confidently predict that online fundraising will take over – but it’s not going to be a smooth transition.  Charities are going to have to fundamentally revise the way they communicate with their donors.  The whole idea that they somehow ‘own’ donors is likely to fall by the wayside eventually.

In this age of micro-attention spans, the printed word is still hanging in there.  Evidently there is still enough excitement to be gleaned from tearing open an envelope and seeing what’s inside.  Perhaps even just the few moments of peace while you take time to read it.

There’s a real dilemma in all this.  The day is approaching when people will be asked to opt in to receive the unsolicited letters we send them.  If we continue to offer our readers a rubbish diet of the same standard begging letter plus leaflet – how many will bother?

As an industry, we should be trying much harder to stir the imagination, to surprise, to move and to inform people with what we write. We need to dispose of the word ‘junk’ once and for all.  We need to be open to the possibility that spending a bit more to produce something brilliant might be worth it; genuinely worth it – because the ROI will be better, which is the real point.

We should be doing everything we can to invest our letters with pulse-quickening ideas, a sense of poetry and love of language that will make them a real joy to read, as well as trying to cadge a donation.  By the way, shouldn’t we write a little more often without asking for money (it worked wonders with my Grandma)?

Is this a strange point of view for an online zealot like me?  Shouldn’t print just be allowed to die?  I don’t think so.  Not for a second.  It would be a bleak future if there were room for only one form of communication.  After all, variety is the spice of life.

Why it’s worth learning to write for Twitter

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

When I look at my Twitter-stream, I find that there are some people whose tweets regularly stand out. They offer a beguiling mix of information and wit that burst onto my screen like verbal fireworks. Beautifully formed thoughts that give the impression of having just rolled effortlessly off the keyboard.

A friend of mine, Mark Wnek, who moved out to The States to become Chief Creative Officer of Lowe NY, is a masterful Twitter writer.  He’s got a brilliant mind, a razor sharp wit and doesn’t suffer fools. His tweets sometimes read like the verbal assaults of an ego-maniac, but they’re always underpinned by self-deprecation and humanity.  Love him or hate him, his tweets are a joy to read. How the hell does he do it?

Well, for starters he’s a copywriter with 25 years experience behind him. A writer who’s taken years to learn his craft.  If you come from a background of press ad and poster writing, you can’t help but feel at home on Twitter.  (The optimum length for a poster headline is 6-8 words.)

For the would-be Mark Twain of Twitter there’s a lesson in this: follow the right people. Make sure you read at least some top quality tweets each day for inspiration.

But, like the spoken word, tweets barely even exist before being swept away by a never-ending torrent of newer posts.  Does it really matter what you write? Well, unless you’re happy talking to yourself, yes it does.

So, what makes a good tweet?

It’s a remarkably difficult question to answer.  Inevitably, it’s a combination of factors: brevity; wit; interesting information; timing; personality.

If you have  established an engaging tone of voice, then a few words from you can have a huge impact.  Stephen Fry, for example, sounds witty saying almost anything.  Easy if you’re him, but since you’re not, you’ll have to work at it.

If you’re tweeting on behalf of your charity, you need to ask yourself:

1. Are your tweets the optimum length?
2. What should the mix of messages be?
3. How often is it okay to ask for support?
4. How do you write a tweet that will get re-tweeted?
5. How do you track your tweets?

(Answers at the end.)

There are some tweeters who come totally left of field.  One of my favourites is Drsamueljohnson.  He (or she?) writes every tweet in the style of the esteemed 18th century author.  Believe it or not, it works.  The tweets are unmistakable and often hilarious.

picture-1

One of the ways to become a good writer on Twitter is to become a good listener.  What I mean by this is learning to spot subtext.

There is a constant stream of people ready to denounce Twitter for being banal.  Even Ken Burnett recently, rather wickedly, described Twitter as ‘drowning in a sea of trivia’.  He was being deliberately provocative, I know, but the point I want to make back to Ken is: learn to read between the lines, you’ll get a lot more out of it.

For example, I saw a tweet the other day from someone who’s a real social media ‘pro’, which read (I’m paraphrasing):

“Goodness it’s 3.30, where has the time gone?”

Can you get more trivial than this?

Think about it again.

This is a guy who keeps up a pretty constant stream of tweets and has a huge following.  He’s been off air for hours.  His tweet is telling me that he’s back (sorry if he ignored me in the interval); he’s telling me that he’s up for a chat; he’s telling me that he’s been incredibly busy; he’s saying hello.  Trivial?  I don’t think so.

There is another reason it’s worth honing your craft when it comes to Twitter writing.  It will make you a better writer – period.  Being brief, concise, witty, attractive and informative all leads to writing that is more effective.  If you can write for Twitter, you can write for anything.

Now, back to those questions I posed earlier.  You can get the answers to all of them, plus a whole heap of really useful tips, at Writing For Twitter, the course I’m running on 5th October.  Hope to see you there.

Cheapskate Cliff Richard Fans

Monday, August 10th, 2009

What’s wrong with the following statement?

“We are mailing half as many people this time round, so we need to halve the income target”

Now, I guess that sounds entirely reasonable, but in fact, it isn’t.

If the number of people you mailed was in a direct proportion to the number of people that responded, then it would indeed make total sense. But fundraising doesn’t work that way. Why?

Let’s say I ask this question:

“Who wants a free ticket to see Cliff Richard?”

sircliff

There is a finite number of people who would be interested in this question. Some people would probably take you up because it is free; some people would take it up because it is Cliff Richard; and some people would take it up because it’s free AND it’s Cliff. We have three distinct groups here:

  • Cheapskates
  • Cliff Richard Fans
  • Cheapskate Cliff Richard Fans

The best responders will naturally be those who admire Sir Cliff and like free tickets. That’s a reasonable expectation because this offer is, like, ‘so totally up their street’.

There is a finite number of people who are ever likely to take you up on your offer – whatever that offer is.

Response rates are funny things. I could, for example, get you a 100% response rate by only asking myself and responding. However, that would just be me and Sir Cliff, which would be pretty uncomfortable for us both.

If you had the money, you could also contact everyone in the whole country. You would certainly have asked all the right people, plus a whole lot more.  But the point remains – it’s only going to be people in those three groups who are ever likely to respond. Of course, you’d get a few randoms… people who were just passing, some lost tourists and the like, but they are going to be in the minority. However, even including this minority, the number of people interested in your offer is finite.

So what is wrong with the original statement?

The point is you need to optimize your outbound communications. Doing anything else results in what some people call junk mail. It is also what I call a terrible waste of money and you shouldn’t do it.

Regardless of that, at some point, you will hit the maximum number of people who are ever going to take you up on your free Cliff ticket.

I’m going to take the next section very slowly. Simon, who’s almost allergic to numbers and is looking pretty blank at the moment, is my litmus test. If he gets this bit, anyone can.

The relationship between the volume compared to response is not linear, it starts getting further and further apart the more people you contact.

(Simon’s nodding doubtfully).

In other words you’ll get a worse and worse response rate, while the costs go up and up.  Knowing how and when to judge this optimum point is a real skill. When you hit it just right – you can get some brilliant results. The nifty thing here is that when judgement is applied in this area by someone who knows what they’re doing (alright I am talking about me, not Simon), you not only get brilliant results, but you know in advance that you’re likely to get these kind of results. They’re wonderfully predictable.  You can’t predict what one person will do, but you can predict what 10,000 people will do.

Far from reducing your income target, you could well be in a position to increase your income at the same time as you cut your costs. It is possible to achieve a greater net income by asking half as many people, as long as you cut out the half that was not likely to respond.

(Nod and a wink from Simon.)

So if, by some curious twist of fate, you actually are wondering who to contact to get rid of a barrel load of free Cliff Richard tickets, the answer is: cheapskate Cliff Richard fans.

An open letter to the next beautiful intern

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Dear next beautiful intern,

Since today’s my last day at Beautiful World and you have yet to start work, this letter is the best way I could think of to do some kind of a handover to you.

I won’t be going through all the ins and outs of working here. The partners of Beautiful World don’t suffer fools gladly and they all come with built-in bullshit detectors. That’s why I’m confident whoever they pick as the next intern will be a pretty clued up person to figure it all out.

What I will do is flesh out my version of the beautiful intern specification and share some of my experience, in the hope that you can use it to make the most out of your time here.

First of all, you have to bring something to the table, like an opinion. If it also makes the partners laugh, it’s a real treat. Their laughter is infectious and it’s the best thing you could hear in the agency, other than news of winning pitches, raising millions for good causes and getting paid.

Therefore, having a sense of humour helps tremendously, because working for the greater good does make you want to tear your hair out sometimes.  Add to that bags of unwavering enthusiasm and you will never lose sight of why you’re really here.

Take initiative. Roll up your sleeves and do as much work as is humanly possible. When you’re done, ask for more. While the partners can do the tasks given to you much better and faster than you can, they sometimes forget that they have way too much on their plate. You’re here to help, so help them. You’re also here to learn, and I guarantee you’ll learn a lot by getting stuck in.

The great thing about working in Beautiful World is that you even get to run a few ideas of your own. If it wasn’t for me, the beautiful pouffe would still be called a footstool.

RHah

Other very useful skills to have are great attention to detail, being highly organised and super efficient, as well as making a gorgeous cup of tea/coffee.

Upon reflection, here are a few highlights from my experience:

Best moments
I know it sounds cliché, but it has to be everyday at Beautiful World. There aren’t many places where you go to work happy and leave work happy, so I’m one very lucky intern.

Greatest challenge
Deciphering Rachel’s handwritten notes.

Biggest regret
Making horrendous coffee for our beautiful visitors. It’s a fact I’ve learnt only recently and I fear the coffee could have been the deal breaker for some of our new business pitches. The partners might have to invest in a ‘million pound coffee maker’. No wait, that’s Adam.

What I’ve learnt
The past few times I’ve been asked the all important question, I couldn’t give a straight answer. I can only hope the words ‘muppet’ and ‘tosser’ didn’t spring to mind.

Some key discoveries:

  • The kettle takes years to boil
  • Chas and Dave
  • ‘Quick’ and ‘dirty’ are words you can also use to describe data

In all seriousness, I’ve learnt more than just recency, frequency, value and not to mention, propensity models.   A lot of what I take from the internship is through observing how the partners all work together and how effective they are in conjuring up really great solutions for the challenges that clients have.  It’s been a great eye-opener and a huge inspiration for me to do the same, if not better.

I’m really grateful to have had the chance to work with the partners of Beautiful World, and to Simon for relinquishing creative control over this letter. They’re really nice people and I know you’ll like them as much as I do.

I do hope that I’ve left Beautiful World a little bit better, more organised and a livelier place to work in and my wish for you is that you will make Beautiful World better in your own way too.

Finally, if any of the partners threaten to superglue you to your chair at the end of your internship to keep you here, it might not be such a bad idea to say yes to that.

Sincerely,

Rebekah

Is fundraising becoming a dirty word?

Monday, July 27th, 2009

So here I am, sitting down to a meeting with another potential beautiful client and we’re doing the introductions.

The guy to my left is in charge of ‘Supporter Retention’ (not development, just retention?). The lady to my right looks after ‘Supporter Acquisition’.  Chairing the meeting is the Head of Supporter Relationship Marketing.

A couple of days before that, I was in a meeting with someone whose job title was ‘Individual Giving Officer – Acquisition’ and, recently, with someone else in charge of ‘Supporter Marketing’. A week or two ago I met a Head of Supporter Services, who was actually the head of the Individual Giving function at that particular charity.

In fact, all of these good people are fundraisers.

Back at the beautiful office, we began to wonder, is this a little like bin men becoming waste removal engineers?  Or how about the window cleaner who is now a vision clearance executive? And the coffee guy who has become a barista?

Perhaps this rash of obscure job titles is symptomatic of a deeper issue? Are charities (at least some of them) becoming embarrassed at the idea of asking for money?

Could part of the reason be the proliferation of ‘social media experts’ flooding into the sector offering charities advice? These self-proclaimed gurus, many of whom have little or no fundraising experience, sell a beguiling dream of online social communities coalescing around charities and good causes in a beatific haze of generosity. Nothing as crude as asking for money need ever happen, if you engage in a dialogue with them, people will just give…

The hell they will.

You won’t find corporate fundraisers pussy-footing around the idea of asking for money. They’d be out of a job. The same applies to Major Donor Fundraisers. (Note the word fundraisers in the job title.) You know exactly what they want when you’ve had a conversation with one of these people, and so does your bank manager.

A creative director who once made my life a misery hammered home a very good piece of advice when it comes to charities and donors: tell people what the problem is, and tell them what you want them to do about it. You want money? Just ask.
picture-2
Very few people put their hands in their pockets on the basis of a hint. Time after time, one of the top reasons donors cite for giving is, simply: ‘I was asked’.

Let’s not be embarrassed to be fundraisers. It’s a noble profession.

Beautiful internship

Friday, July 24th, 2009

We have this wonderful intern.  She’s bright, ruthlessly efficient, a real pleasure to have around.

She’s learned about fundraising and marketing, and loads about data analysis, since she’s been with us.

There’s only one problem: she’s leaving to do an MA.

Know anyone who could replace her?

Email: rachel@hellobeautifulworld.com

Is it me, or has charity become cool?

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Well, I’ve just checked with a few people and apparently it isn’t me.  According to my daughter I score “zero” on the cool-o-meter.  So it must, therefore, be the world of charity.

At the weekend, business woman, Mary Portas observed in the Observer that: “Our cultural G spot has moved. It used to be greed. Now it’s giving.”

Only a couple of years ago, when I mentioned that I did work for charities it brought a quick, embarrassed silence to the conversation.  Now the same people look at me as if I’m some sort of saint (if only they knew!).

Charity, it seems, has become like rehab – everybody who’s anybody is going there.

So what’s happened?  Well for one thing the rich and famous are still at it.  This morning the papers were full of Madonna adopting a second orphan from Malawi.  Comic Relief has just had its best year ever.  Everywhere you look someone famous is involved in a little judicious giving.

In an article in the New York Times, Naomi Levine, an expert on philanthropy at New York University, said young people, “more than ever want to do something.”  Judging from the calibre of the people who want to come and work with us, this is definitely true.

Of course, social media is playing a role in this as well. Earlier this year Hugh Jackman (better known to many as Wolverine) offered to giveaway $100,000 to whichever charity could make themselves most appealing in 140 characters:

picture-18

This is exciting stuff.  Anyone could play and many of us did.

Politicians are also doing their bit (albeit unwittingly) by making such a public display of  greed and incompetence.  Enough to drive anybody in the opposite direction.

Then of course there is the recession, forcing all of us to re-examine our values. Finally there is the environment.  The once cranky idea that you don’t just consume but need to put something back is now mainstream.

These may be hard times but, in many ways, people want to give back more than ever.  Now that’s cool.

welcome to beautiful world.
we’re
very excited* that you’re here.

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

A few quick facts about us:

We have huge fundraising experience.

We launched in May last year and, within a couple of months, we’d helped one of our clients raise over a million pounds from one appeal (and bought a banjo to celebrate).

We do creative, strategy and data – on and offline.

We work in any media from print to film to the web.

We’re passionate about social media. We don’t just talk it, we live it.

We try to be a jargon-free zone; unusual for new media geeks.

If you’d like to see what we’re like up close, drop in and see us.
The music is usually playing and the coffee is always hot.

*Note: wildly excited people do better work, which gets better results.

Have a look around. Browse the blog. Follow us on Twitter.
Call us on the telephone: 0207 739 6136.

home
clients
work
what we do
people
events
blog
press
jobs
contact

Charities Charity Facebook Fundraising Just Giving NFPtweetup non-profit online social media Twitter
RSS Feed

connect with us:

beautiful world on Twitter
beautiful world on Facebook
beautiful world on Flickr
beautiful world on Posterous